Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- out_of_the_box:tools:supporting:commitment [2020/02/27 13:04]
caro
+++ out_of_the_box:tools:supporting:commitment [2020/04/07 15:36] (current)
ceci
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
   * Reflecting together on ways we could take action for social change
-===== Scenario: =====
+===== Scenario =====
 **Duration:** 1 hour 35 minutes
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 For 5 minutes, invite the participant to write down on post-its "**What outrages them right now in the society?**" (2 post-it max per person to keep it short).
-Gather in circle and ask the participants to share one after the other their **reasons of indignation**.
+Gather the participants in circle and ask them to share one after the other their **reasons of indignation**.
-Collect their propositions to create a **mind map** of what outrages them.
+Collect their propositions as they come to create a **mind map** of what outrages them.
-Give a break to participants so as gaining time to sort the ideas that came out.
+Give a break to participants so as gaining time to sort their ideas better.
-** Step 3: Detailed analysis of one limiting belief** (1 hour 30 minutes)
+** Step 3: Reflecting n how we could take action to bring a change** (1 hour)
-After a break (15 minutes), invite the participants to **choose one limiting belief** among all those they have pointed out previously that they would like to **analyze more deeply**.\\
+Invite the participants to **choose one issue** among all those that emerged previously on which they would like to work.Create working groups accordingly (ideally 5 to 6 groups). \\
-Precise that they won't have time to all do the exercise: some of them will dig into their case, some others won't, but they will help the others to dig into theirs which is a nice exercise too.
-In practice, ask the participants to question their limiting belief through the lens of:
-  * the **science** (what the science says about it: sociology, psychology, ethnology, etc.)
-  * other people's **point of views** (what people think and say about it?)
-  * their contradictions (what is contradictory in it?)
-  * their causes (why it is as it is?)
-  * their consequences.
-One will talk and lead the analysis on his/her case. The 2 others will **ease the process by questioning**, improving thus their ability to **listen actively** and **ask relevant questions**.
-When the analysis comes to its end, roles switch, allowing another member of the trio to analyze her/his limiting belief.
+Let the participants 45 minutes to reflect on **how they could take action** and **bring a change** on the issue they are working on.\\
+Encourage them to **think practical**. The more practical and precise they will be, the more effective the session will be.
 ===== Material required =====
-  * A video projector (if you introduce the limiting belief through a video)
+  * Post-its
+  * A flipchart (to create the mind map)
+  * 5-6 tables to work on
+  * flipchart papers for each group to take notes.
 {{:frise_rose.jpg?nolink&600 |}}

Out of the box

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools