Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- out_of_the_box:tools:cooperation:consent [2020/03/26 18:10]
caro [Consent Decision Making]
+++ out_of_the_box:tools:cooperation:consent [2020/03/26 18:48] (current)
caro [Material required]
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Methodological Guidelines by l'[[http://universite-du-nous.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/fiche-gpc-aide-gb.pdf|Université du Nous]]
 ===== Objectives =====
-  * 1
+  * Taking a decision together by consent (meaning no one has an objection).
-  * 2
-  * 3
 ===== Scenario =====
-**Duration** : 60-90 minutes
+**Duration** : 90 minutes
 **> Step 1 : GETTING TO A PROPOSAL**
 **Listening to the centre**\\
-Everybody is invited to share views, values, thoughts, etc.. about the topic. \\
+One after the other, invite participants to share their views, values, thoughts, etc. about the topic.\\
-This is a space for back and forth discussion and collaborative process to help crafting a proposal.
+This is a space for **back and forth discussion** and **collaborative process** to help **crafting a proposal**.
 **Crafting a proposal**\\
 //Drawing up a topic//\\
-It is advisable to make a very simple proposal to begin with. It will evolve with collective intelligence through the decision by consent process.\\
+After listening to the centre, ask for someone (or for 2 volunteers) to **phrase a proposal**. (Alternatively, you can ask the circle members to set up an improvement group to work on a written proposal.)\\
-After listening to the centre, the facilitator ask for someone to formulate a proposal. Alternatively, he/she can ask the circle members to set up an improvement group to work on a written proposal.\\
+Advise them to make a very simple proposal to begin with. It will evolve with collective intelligence through the decision by consent process.\\
 **Bringing forward a proposal**\\
-A circle member makes a proposal as a proposer.\\
+The circle member(s) make(s) a proposal as (a) proposer(s).\\
 Only one proposal is dealt with at a time.\\
 **Criteria for a valid proposal**
-  * It takes into account points shared when speaking and listening to the centre
+  * It takes into account the point of views and ideas expressed when listening to the centre ;
-  * It is clear and understandable by each circle member
+  * It is clear and understandable by each circle member ;
-  * All circle members agree to start with it as a basis for further work
+  * All circle members agree to start with it as a basis for further work ;
-  * Do not belong anymore to the proposer once it has been brought forward and clarified
+  * It do not belong anymore to the proposer(s) once it has been brought forward and clarified.
 **> Step 2: CLARIFYING QUESTIONS**
-//Is it clear enough ? Do I fully understand ?//\\
+//Is it clear enough? Do I fully understand ?//\\
-Anyone can ask clarifying questions to better understand the proposal. The proposer answers the questions and clarifies the intent of the proposal. The objective is to remove any doubt or possible misinterpretation about the proposal. The proposer does not answer questions starting with ‘’Why’’. Reactions and opinions are not expressed during this round (but in phase 2).
+Anyone can ask **clarifying questions** to better understand the proposal. The proposer(s) answer(s) the questions and clarifies the intent of the proposal. The objective is to **remove any doubt or possible misinterpretation** about the proposal.\\
+The proposer(s) do(es) not answer questions starting with "Why". Reactions and opinions are not expressed during this round (it will be done in phase 3).
 **> Step 3: REACTION ROUND**
-//Does the proposal contribute to my needs, or the needs of the project through the organization?//
+//Does the proposal contribute to my needs, or the needs of the project through the organization?//\\
-Each participant shares reactions (impressions, feelings,...) about the proposal, one person at a time. It is a perfect phase for providing different perspectives and suggesting improvements to the proposal, so that the proposer can integrate those changes in phase 3 if he/she wants to.\\
+Each participant shares **reactions** (impressions, feelings,...) about the proposal, one person at a time. It is a perfect phase for providing **different perspectives** and **suggesting improvements** to the proposal so that the proposer(s) can integrate those changes in phase 4 if they want to.\\
-The proposer tries to get a sense of what is emerging from the centre.
+The proposer(s) try(ies) to get a sense of what is emerging from the centre.
 **> Step 4: AMENDING**
-After the reaction round, the proposer is invited to either :
+After the reaction round, the proposer(s) is(are) invited to either :
-  * re-clarify the proposal or the intent of the proposal
+  * **re-clarify** the proposal or the intent of the proposal
-  * make amendments to the proposal : he/she can modify the proposal
+  * **make amendments** to the proposal : they can modify the proposal
-  * withdraw the proposal, if it turns out to be not relevant.\\
+  * **withdraw** the proposal, if it turns out to be not relevant.\\
-If the proposal is withdrawn, go back to phase 0 with a new proposal.
+If the proposal is withdrawn, the group goes back to phase 1 with a new proposal.
 **> Step 5: OBJECTION ROUND**
-//An objection is not a preference, nor another perspective / proposal.\\
+//An objection is **not a preference**, **nor another perspective / proposal**.\\
-It is what I believe would either not respect my limits or jeopardise our organisaton / project.//\\
+It is what I believe would either not respect my limits or jeopardise our organisation / project.//\\
-One at a time, the facilitator asks each participant if they have objections to adopting the proposal.If there is no objection raised, the proposal is adopted. Go directly to the celebration phase.\\
+One at a time, ask each participant if they have objections to adopting the proposal.
-If there is one or several objections raised, the facilitator addresses them one after the other.\\
+  * If there is no objection raised, the proposal is adopted. You can go directly to the celebration phase.\\
-The facilitator concentrates on the formulation of the objections. He/she writes them on a board along with the name of the objectors.\\
+  * If there is one or several objections raised, address them one after the other, following the order in which they were expressed.\\
-To raise an objection is like offering something personal and it benefits the group.\\
+Ask the members who have an objection to give it a name (using a keyword) and write it down on a board, along with the name of the "objector" (=the person raising the objection).\\
-An objection is a real gift to the group. The group can then go further exploring other parts of the proposal not discussed so far.
+Remember all participants that raising an objection is not bad ; rather it is a gift for the group. Thanks to it, the group can then go further exploring other parts of the proposal that were not discussed so far.
 **TESTING THE OBJECTIONS**
-First, the facilitator discards an objection if it cancels out the proposal. If so, go back to phase 0.\\
+First, discard an objection if it cancels out the proposal. If so, go back to phase 0.\\
-The facilitator cannot decide if the objection is reasonable or not. He/she can only ask questions to help the objector to present reasonable arguments.\\
+As the facilitator of the meeting, you cannot decide if the objection is reasonable or not. You can only ask questions to help the objector to present reasonable arguments.\\
-An objection is reasonable if :
+You may consider the objection is reasonable if :
-  * It leads to an improvement through collective intelligence within the circle
+  * it leads to an **improvement** through collective intelligence within the circle
-  * It cancels out the proposal, making it irrelevant (we save time and start with a new proposal)
+  * it **cancels out the proposal**, making it irrelevant (the group will then save time and start with a new proposal)
-  * It is clearly well-argued
+  * it is **clearly well-argued**
-  * It does not hide, consciously or unconsciously, a preference or another proposal.
+  * it does **not hide, consciously or unconsciously, a preference or another proposal**.
-**Questions the facilitator may ask to test the objection**:
+**Questions you may ask, as a facilitator, to test the objection**:
   * "What are the arguments?"
   * "Is it a preference?"
@@ Line 83: / Line 83: @@
 **> Step 6: IMPROVEMENTS**
-The facilitator addresses objections one at a time. Objections stated to the centre belong now to the group. This is a space for back and forth discussion and collaborative process to help resolving the objection.\\
+Address objections one at a time. Objections stated to the centre belong now to the group. This is a space for **back and forth discussion** and collaborative process to help **resolving the objection**.\\
-The facilitator checks now and then if the objection is resolved for the objector or not. If a discussed solution may resolve an objection, the person who raised it informs the group.\\
+Check now and then if the objection is resolved for the objector or not. If a discussed solution may resolve an objection, the person who raised it informs the group.\\
-Once all objections are resolved, the facilitator moves back to the objection round to check for new objections.\\
+Once all objections are resolved, move back to the objection round to check for new objections.\\
-When there is no objection left, the proposal is adopted by mutual consent.
+When there is **no objection left**, the proposal **is adopted by mutual consent**.
 **> Step 7: CELEBRATION**
-//To celebrate the decision by consent//
+Time for celebration !
-To pat each other for this milestone reached together. The group chooses the best way to celebrate (applause, meal, party...)
+Pat each other for this milestone reached together!\\
+Up to the group to choose the best way to celebrate (applause, meal, party...)
 ===== Material required =====
@@ Line 97: / Line 98: @@
   * A flipchart
   * Markers of different colors.
+Click [[http://universite-du-nous.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/fiche-gpc-aide-gb.pdf|here]] to access to the **Consent Decision Making guidelines** designed by l'Université du Nous and [[http://universite-du-nous.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/process-gest-par-constt-v5bis-gb.pdf|there]] to access to the graphic resume they drew of it.
 {{:frise_rose.jpg?nolink&600|}}

Out of the box

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools